I have respect for those guys too, and I use jboss every chance I get.
This does appear to be a bona-fide bug, though. However, since it
appears to be already fixed in the CVS head, I don't see the point in
reporting. Also I can't point to any specific resource which said local
interfaces were supported in 2.4, but I thought they were. Perhaps that
was my mistake to assume so. Either way I guess I'll start working off
the CVS head of jboss.
Thanks,
Bryan
Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
>>From what you've said it certainly does look like a JBoss problem. I have
>a lot of respect for those guys, hence my initial reservations about
>placing the blame on JBoss. Are you going to post this to jboss-user and
>see what response you get?
>
>I've also just had a (quick) look at the 2.4 release and current manual,
>and I cant actually find a claim that local interfaces are
>supported... so it could be as simple as we're assuming they are
>supported when they're not (o: Have you tried it against cvs head?
>
>cheesr
>dim
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
