Ok
I just merge the patch to 2.4 branch.
I am afraid just after release 2.4.1, it will be 2.4.2...
This is the only problem I encounter while working with local interfaces.
You can trust 2.4 for that matter - and the other matters as well ;)
Regards.


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Bryan
> Field-Elliot
> Envoye : vendredi 7 septembre 2001 6:01
> A : Dmitri Colebatch
> Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Local interfaces problem - Jboss 2.4 broken,
> not xdoclet
>
>
> I have respect for those guys too, and I use jboss every chance I get.
> This does appear to be a bona-fide bug, though. However, since it
> appears to be already fixed in the CVS head, I don't see the point in
> reporting. Also I can't point to any specific resource which said local
> interfaces were supported in 2.4, but I thought they were. Perhaps that
> was my mistake to assume so. Either way I guess I'll start working off
> the CVS head of jboss.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan
>
>
>
> Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
>
> >>From what you've said it certainly does look like a JBoss
> problem.  I have
> >a lot of respect for those guys, hence my initial reservations about
> >placing the blame on JBoss.  Are you going to post this to jboss-user and
> >see what response you get?
> >
> >I've also just had a (quick) look at the 2.4 release and current manual,
> >and I cant actually find a claim that local interfaces are
> >supported... so it could be as simple as we're assuming they are
> >supported when they're not (o:  Have you tried it against cvs head?
> >
> >cheesr
> >dim
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
>


_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to