Bryan
On Mon, 2001-09-10 at 15:16, Vincent Harcq wrote:
Ok I just merge the patch to 2.4 branch. I am afraid just after release 2.4.1, it will be 2.4.2... This is the only problem I encounter while working with local interfaces. You can trust 2.4 for that matter - and the other matters as well ;) Regards. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Bryan > Field-Elliot > Envoye : vendredi 7 septembre 2001 6:01 > A : Dmitri Colebatch > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Local interfaces problem - Jboss 2.4 broken, > not xdoclet > > > I have respect for those guys too, and I use jboss every chance I get. > This does appear to be a bona-fide bug, though. However, since it > appears to be already fixed in the CVS head, I don't see the point in > reporting. Also I can't point to any specific resource which said local > interfaces were supported in 2.4, but I thought they were. Perhaps that > was my mistake to assume so. Either way I guess I'll start working off > the CVS head of jboss. > > Thanks, > > Bryan > > > > Dmitri Colebatch wrote: > > >>From what you've said it certainly does look like a JBoss > problem. I have > >a lot of respect for those guys, hence my initial reservations about > >placing the blame on JBoss. Are you going to post this to jboss-user and > >see what response you get? > > > >I've also just had a (quick) look at the 2.4 release and current manual, > >and I cant actually find a claim that local interfaces are > >supported... so it could be as simple as we're assuming they are > >supported when they're not (o: Have you tried it against cvs head? > > > >cheesr > >dim > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
