On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> 0.2- Is AbstractEjbSubTask.isInterfaceMethod() ok? It uses
> startsWith("ejbCreate")/blabla whereas it should look at
> ejb:create-method/blabla.
I think this is ok... because: it is only isRemoveMethod and
isFinderMethod that check this way, and we dont have method level tags for
them... yes?
cheers
dim
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
- [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Ara Abrahamian
- Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Dmitri Colebatch
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Ara Abrahamian
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Dmitri Colebatch
- Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Dmitri Colebatch
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Ara Abrahamian
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Dmitri Colebatch
- [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Ara Abrahamian
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Dmitri Colebatch
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Ara Abrahamian
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Dmitri Colebatch
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Ara Abrahamian
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Andrew Stevens
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Dmitri Colebatch
- Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far minh_kama_yie
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Ara Abrahamian
- RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Andrew Stevens
- FW: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Ara Abrahamian
- Re: FW: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far Andrew Stevens
