On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Websphere-> bnd/ext to me seems complete (confirm?), it needs docs.
> Schema stuff no. So we'll put it there in release but with no docs :o)
> What do you think? What's Minh's schedule for that?
I spoke to him last night and he said a week or so, so probably go with
what is there. we should get into the "release early, release
often" pattern... I for one am pretty young int he open source world, but
this seems to be the rule of thumb, and I certainly haven't been following
it... given that we now have stable tags, I think we can release... there
aren't going to be a hell of a lot of changes for the end user coming up
(except for those writing templates)
> Anyway, I'm not sure it's the best decision. If sure weblogic/websphere
> stuff will arrive in a week then we can wait more.
as I said above, I think we're ready to run... I might just do a couple of
things on the docs tonight my time (sydney), but I would be happy to
launch with a "wl/ws coming soon" or similar.... just my 2c
cheesr
dim
>
> Ara.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:30 PM
> > To: Ara Abrahamian
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> >
> > > Oh yeah, you're right. But ifFinderMethod is useless, cause there's
> no
> > > findBy method in bean impl but in ejb:finder in class tags :o)
> > > AFAIK we can remove it.
> >
> > yep - agree.
> >
> > re v1.0 - what are we going to do re docs, and non-fully implemented
> > things (wl6, ws4)... are we going to bundle something together without
> any
> > of the weblogic/sphere support and have that as the official
> > jboss/orion/etc release?
> >
> > cheesr
> > dim
> >
> > >
> > > Ara.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:39 PM
> > > > To: Ara Abrahamian
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 0.2- Is AbstractEjbSubTask.isInterfaceMethod() ok? It uses
> > > > > startsWith("ejbCreate")/blabla whereas it should look at
> > > > > ejb:create-method/blabla.
> > > > I think this is ok... because: it is only isRemoveMethod and
> > > > isFinderMethod that check this way, and we dont have method level
> tags
> > > for
> > > > them... yes?
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > > dim
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> > >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
