Hi all,
I agree with Dim on "coming soon", would prefer to have Map.dbxmi and
Schema.dbxmi fully tested and documented before including it in any release.
In terms of work schedule though I'll be pushing to get it fully tested by
the end of the week and hope to get the documentation done early next week....
Regards,
minh
On Wednesday 12 September 2001 08:05, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Websphere-> bnd/ext to me seems complete (confirm?), it needs docs.
> Schema stuff no. So we'll put it there in release but with no docs :o)
> What do you think? What's Minh's schedule for that?
I spoke to him last night and he said a week or so, so probably go with
what is there. we should get into the "release early, release
often" pattern... I for one am pretty young int he open source world, but
this seems to be the rule of thumb, and I certainly haven't been following
it... given that we now have stable tags, I think we can release... there
aren't going to be a hell of a lot of changes for the end user coming up
(except for those writing templates)
> Anyway, I'm not sure it's the best decision. If sure weblogic/websphere
> stuff will arrive in a week then we can wait more.
as I said above, I think we're ready to run... I might just do a couple of
things on the docs tonight my time (sydney), but I would be happy to
launch with a "wl/ws coming soon" or similar.... just my 2c
cheesr
dim
> Ara.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:30 PM
> > To: Ara Abrahamian
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> > > Oh yeah, you're right. But ifFinderMethod is useless, cause there's
>
> no
>
> > > findBy method in bean impl but in ejb:finder in class tags :o)
> > > AFAIK we can remove it.
> >
> > yep - agree.
> >
> > re v1.0 - what are we going to do re docs, and non-fully implemented
> > things (wl6, ws4)... are we going to bundle something together without
>
> any
>
> > of the weblogic/sphere support and have that as the official
> > jboss/orion/etc release?
> >
> > cheesr
> > dim
> >
> > > Ara.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:39 PM
> > > > To: Ara Abrahamian
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> > > > > 0.2- Is AbstractEjbSubTask.isInterfaceMethod() ok? It uses
> > > > > startsWith("ejbCreate")/blabla whereas it should look at
> > > > > ejb:create-method/blabla.
> > > >
> > > > I think this is ok... because: it is only isRemoveMethod and
> > > > isFinderMethod that check this way, and we dont have method level
>
> tags
>
> > > for
> > >
> > > > them... yes?
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > > dim
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
