A wise old hermit known only as Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/src/xdoclet/ejb > In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv3582/core/src/xdoclet/ejb > > Modified Files: > Tag: NAMESPACE_REFACTOR_BRANCH > EntityBmpSubTask.java > Log Message: > Fixed bugs 472759 and 472764 - at present untested. 472759 - OK. With @ejb:bean generate="false" the BMP class isn't generated any more, but the other files are. 472764 - not okay. With @ejb:bean generate="false" the template assumes the EJB is an abstract one and not to be included in the DD (so instead of getting the wrong class name, now I get nothing at all). In fact, it's entirely the reverse situation; the reason I don't want it generated is because it's a concrete BMP implementation rather than the abstract Bean class XDoclet wants... Perhaps as well as the generate parameter, we need another one (e.g. deploy="true|false", default = true) for whether or not a bean should be included in the DD. That way, if it really is an abstract EJB there's a way to exclude it from the DD, but that's independent of whether we're generating the BMP/CMP/Session class for it. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
