A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> I'm a lazy guy, > I forgot to add @tags but at least I have something generated for me > using defaults! :o) ... > > Plus, if XDoclet ignores classes without any @ejb: tags, I can carry > on > > using <include name="**/*.java"/> for my ejbdoclet fileset even though > > others are creating EJBs in the same source tree using other tools. > > You mean ejbdoclet should only process files that have an @ejb:bean in > them. What's wrong with <include> approach? I'm lazy too... I don't want to end up with a bunch of stuff like <include name="**/mypackage/*.java"/> <include name="**/Mybean2EJB.java"/> <exclude name="**/mypackage/Hisbean1EJB.java"/> <exclude name="**/mypackage/hissubpackage/*.java"/> in the build file. It's more to maintain, particularly if I later convert any of the other beans to use xdoclet tags instead, as I'd also have to update the build file each time. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
