On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Andrew Stevens wrote: > *Everything* generated? But isn't the most likely reason for there being > no @ejb: tags that it's legacy code, for which you'd already have > everything you want?
did you see the email just now from Clarance on xdoclet-user? Talking about exactly this problem... upgrade from 1.0 to cvs and everything broke because of missing @ejb:bean tags which were absent by design. > I don't think it's unreasonable that you have to include some XDoclet tags > (e.g. @ejb:bean) in an EJB if you want XDoclet to do anything with it. > Plus, if XDoclet ignores classes without any @ejb: tags, I can carry on > using <include name="**/*.java"/> for my ejbdoclet fileset even though > others are creating EJBs in the same source tree using other tools. perhaps a config switch would be easier. THere's two issues really... 1. what to do if no @ejb:bean found - generate or not 2. what to do if required parameters found - complain, or use defaults yes? If we have a config switch then we can do both... cheers dim _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
