While I find the absence of dependency checking on templates slightly annoying, I don't think we really need core support for it. I find it highly advisable to experiment on small projects when developing templates, and do ./build.sh clean jmxdoclet for instance.
I think the gain/added complexity balance definitely goes towards leaving it out. david jencks On 2002.02.28 10:54:29 -0500 Erik Hatcher wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > [ 510475 ] <template> dependency checking > > Is this still a WontFix, Vincent? In which case, unless Erik objects, > let's > > Close it. > > I do object! :) > > It seems silly not to include the template in the dependency checks. If > the > template has changed, then regeneration should occur. Or am I totally > insane in thinking that? Isn't this a simple change with nothing but > positive repercusions? Typically templates aren't going to change > between > builds, but during my development of custom templates they do. > > Erik > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
