Complexity? How complex is it?
I just don't understand this.... seems like such a no brainer to me, but I
must be missing something if its complex to implement.
Erik
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Open tracker issues
> While I find the absence of dependency checking on templates slightly
> annoying, I don't think we really need core support for it. I find it
> highly advisable to experiment on small projects when developing
templates,
> and do ./build.sh clean jmxdoclet for instance.
>
> I think the gain/added complexity balance definitely goes towards leaving
> it out.
>
> david jencks
>
> On 2002.02.28 10:54:29 -0500 Erik Hatcher wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andrew Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > [ 510475 ] <template> dependency checking
> > > Is this still a WontFix, Vincent? In which case, unless Erik objects,
> > let's
> > > Close it.
> >
> > I do object! :)
> >
> > It seems silly not to include the template in the dependency checks. If
> > the
> > template has changed, then regeneration should occur. Or am I totally
> > insane in thinking that? Isn't this a simple change with nothing but
> > positive repercusions? Typically templates aren't going to change
> > between
> > builds, but during my development of custom templates they do.
> >
> > Erik
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
