I still think we should add xdoclet/lib/xjavadoc.jar for simplicity. People shouldn't need to download and build xjavadoc in order to use XDoclet (I'm talking about all the XDoclet CVS users here). Thoughts?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ara > Abrahamian > Sent: 22. mars 2002 13:45 > To: 'Vincent Harcq'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch > > > Imho it's better to copy xjavadoc.jar to xdoclet/lib dir when building > xjavadoc. It's boring to upload a jar file each time. Assume xdoclet and > xjavadoc are in the same folder/level. > > Ara. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vincent Harcq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:39 AM > > To: 'Aslak Hellesoy'; 'Ara Abrahamian'; xdoclet- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch > > > > > -But I know one thing: If xdoclet.jar is regenerated, xdoclet > > > doesn't regenerate sources as it used to do. We (you) should > > > check xjavadoc.jar age too. > > > > Yep, I'll do that. > > BTW we should cvs add xjavadoc.jar to xdoclet/lib no ? > > I am also thinking of adding Version info in the Manifest of the jars > > (xdoclet and xjavadoc) just to know with wich version you work. With > a > > ant filter or something... > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
