This is the best for the future, have a build that build only xjavadoc or xjavadoc+xdoclet or xjavadoc+xdoclet+xdocletgui or.... But what Aslak have done is ok for me for the moment : manual checkout of xjavadoc, build of xdoclet looking is xjavadoc rebuild is needed. When we tag we have to tag both. With a property "version" (a la ant @VERSION@) in both build.xml we can push it in the Manifest of xdoclet.jar and xjavadoc.jar so we always know with which version of what we run. When having to release : cvs update cvs tag version build dist change version in build.xml for the next builds. again and again
JBoss is going further by lokking the CVS tag with wich you cvs update and store it as the version but it is a bit overkill for us imho. Vincent --- Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A wise old hermit known only as =?us-ascii?Q?Aslak_Hellesoy?= > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said: > > > > > I still think we should add xdoclet/lib/xjavadoc.jar for > simplicity. > > > People > > > shouldn't need to download and build xjavadoc in order to use > XDoclet > > > (I'm talking about all the XDoclet CVS users here). Thoughts? > > > > I agree; we should include xjavadoc.jar in xdoclet/lib, > copied/updated > > there during xjavadoc's build but versioned (i.e. update the CVS > copy) > > when we do a release of xjavadoc. Since we currently have xdoclet > and > > xdocletgui (and potentially other 3rd party programs) independently > > > relying on xjavadoc, we should manage its versions/releases better > (which > > means more work for me, dammit :-) ) As for how we then deal with > > changes/fixes to xdoclet that also require changes to xjavadoc, I > suggest > > they should use a branch, and merge it back on the following > release of > > xjavadoc containing it. > > another option is > > xdoclet-all/xjavadoc > /xdoclet > /xdoclet-gui > > stolen straight from the jboss setup... > > cheers > dim > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Ara > > > > Abrahamian > > > > Sent: 22. mars 2002 13:45 > > > > To: 'Vincent Harcq'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch > > > > > > > > > > > > Imho it's better to copy xjavadoc.jar to xdoclet/lib dir when > building > > > > xjavadoc. It's boring to upload a jar file each time. Assume > xdoclet > > > > and xjavadoc are in the same folder/level. > > > > > > > > Ara. > > > > This would still be the case - you wouldn't upload a new > xjavadoc.jar > > every time, I'd do it on each xjavadoc release. The xjavadoc > build.xml > > would indeed assume the same folder level, and copy it over into > > xdoclet/lib after building it, so you can still develop xdoclet > against > > the current cvs xjavadoc. The only restriction is that if your > changes > > require the xjavadoc changes, and don't work against the current > release > > xjavadoc.jar, it should use a branch so as not to break the GUMP > builds. > > > > However, we should only worry about any of this once it's stable > and > > there's no more integration changes. > > > > Like I said, just my opinion (but similar to what we do at work > where we > > have framework sources and application sources maintained > separately by > > different development teams). > > > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Vincent Harcq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:39 AM > > > > > To: 'Aslak Hellesoy'; 'Ara Abrahamian'; xdoclet- > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch > > > > > > > > > > > -But I know one thing: If xdoclet.jar is regenerated, > xdoclet > > > > > > doesn't regenerate sources as it used to do. We (you) > should > > > > > > check xjavadoc.jar age too. > > > > > > > > > > Yep, I'll do that. > > > > > BTW we should cvs add xjavadoc.jar to xdoclet/lib no ? > > > > > I am also thinking of adding Version info in the Manifest of > the > > > > > jars > > > > > (xdoclet and xjavadoc) just to know with wich version you > work. > > > > > With a ant filter or something... > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards� http://movies.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
