Ok, ok. I think eclipse is cool, but I don't wanna die for it ;-) I just noting that if there are intention to support Eclipse "hardcoded" swing is not the way, but with a wrapper, as you notes, there are no problems to support swing based and (the only) swt based IDEs.
BTW my preferred IDE before I used eclipse was NetBeans but swt is more (more, really) responsive and "native-look-and-feel" than swing. And they are porting swt to GTK+2!! Xavi El jue, 04-04-2002 a las 13:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > > > Me too. Eclipse is really cool. But eclipse and eclipse plugins are > > based in SWT as GUI framework, i.e. all work based in Swing is wasted > > time. So, if eclipse is the way to go (and IMHO it is THE IDE) > > change to > > SWT as soon as possible. > > > > Xavi > > Xavier, even though you think Eclipse is the best IDE in the world, I > think there are still a few people around who *might* be using a > different IDE and *might* think we've made a bad choice if XDocletGUI > only supports Eclipse. > > We should still be able to support other popular IDEs. Therefore, > (vendor-)locking us to SWT is a bad idea (even though I'm sure SWT is > the best Java GUI framework in the world). If we code XDocletGUI in > SWT, there will be no support for IDEA,NetBeans,JBuilder... right? > > The XDoclet GUI core should (of course) be portable, and there should > be wrappers (SWT, IDEA, blabla) that tie it to particular IDEs. > > Aslak _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
