--- Aslak_Hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because Javadoc 1.4 complains about foo:bar in tag
> names, we decided some
> time back to use foo.bar instead.
> It seems this hasn't quite sunk in. There is still a
> lot of foo:bar both in
> templates, tag handlers examples and xtags.xml.
> 
> xjavadoc (which is responsible for all tag retrieval
> both in xdoclet and
> xdoclet gui) doesn't care whether you ask for a tag
> using foo:bar or
> foo.bar, because when it scans a class it converts
> all foo:bar to foo.bar.
> Later, if someone asks for foo:bar, it will actually
> look for foo.bar. This
> works fine as far as I know.

Actually xjavadoc converts foo.bar into foo:bar
on parsing stage by applying dotted().


I just disabled dotted() and now I see a lot of shit
happen :)

I will try to reverse dotted() behaviour, and then
pull sample files through GUI - this shall convert
them
to .-form

Getting tag values in tag handlers seems to be
also outdated. Going through getTagValue(bla bla bla
bla ... ) if you already have XClass is suboptimal. 

Shall I convert it to just calling Xjavadoc calls?

regards,

=====
Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik )    Freelance Software developer
< http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de >
< render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ >

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to