--- Aslak_Hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because Javadoc 1.4 complains about foo:bar in tag > names, we decided some > time back to use foo.bar instead. > It seems this hasn't quite sunk in. There is still a > lot of foo:bar both in > templates, tag handlers examples and xtags.xml. > > xjavadoc (which is responsible for all tag retrieval > both in xdoclet and > xdoclet gui) doesn't care whether you ask for a tag > using foo:bar or > foo.bar, because when it scans a class it converts > all foo:bar to foo.bar. > Later, if someone asks for foo:bar, it will actually > look for foo.bar. This > works fine as far as I know.
Actually xjavadoc converts foo.bar into foo:bar on parsing stage by applying dotted(). I just disabled dotted() and now I see a lot of shit happen :) I will try to reverse dotted() behaviour, and then pull sample files through GUI - this shall convert them to .-form Getting tag values in tag handlers seems to be also outdated. Going through getTagValue(bla bla bla bla ... ) if you already have XClass is suboptimal. Shall I convert it to just calling Xjavadoc calls? regards, ===== Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik ) Freelance Software developer < http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de > < render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel