> Yeah. Bad idea ;-) Reversing dotted should do the
> trick.

It did :) Already commited.


> I think the getTagValue(bla bla bla) adds some extra
> functionality that
> isn't in xjavadoc yet, doesn't it? I mean checking
> for valid values,
> providing defaults and so on. -So I don't think you
> can do this before
> equivalent functionality is added to xjavadoc.

So we are speaking about integrating xtags into
xdoclet  core.  ( xjavadoc shall not make such
decisions. It's there to parse tags. )


I also processed examples source tree by GUI, 
and now they are guaranted to have dotted syntax. 


Shall I do the same with xdoclet sources?
Then there wil be no tag with :


And I also finished writing docs for GUI. 
Distribution assembly works now. 

Maybe it's ripe for alpha release?
( if current xdoclet version supports modules )


regards,

=====
Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik )    Freelance Software developer
< http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de >
< render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ >

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to