> Yeah. Bad idea ;-) Reversing dotted should do the > trick.
It did :) Already commited. > I think the getTagValue(bla bla bla) adds some extra > functionality that > isn't in xjavadoc yet, doesn't it? I mean checking > for valid values, > providing defaults and so on. -So I don't think you > can do this before > equivalent functionality is added to xjavadoc. So we are speaking about integrating xtags into xdoclet core. ( xjavadoc shall not make such decisions. It's there to parse tags. ) I also processed examples source tree by GUI, and now they are guaranted to have dotted syntax. Shall I do the same with xdoclet sources? Then there wil be no tag with : And I also finished writing docs for GUI. Distribution assembly works now. Maybe it's ripe for alpha release? ( if current xdoclet version supports modules ) regards, ===== Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik ) Freelance Software developer < http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de > < render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel