--- Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simple question:
> 
> Why in beta 3 release all jar are having 1.2b3-dev
> suffix in their names?
> 
> e.g.:
> xdoclet-borland-module-1.2b3-dev.jar
> 
> is there good reason for that?

I'm not aware of it...

> Why just not 1.2b3? 
> 
> Is this mistake ?

Unfortunately this release was not-so-smooth....

regards,

=====
----[ Konstantin Pribluda ( ko5tik ) ]----------------
Zu Verst�rkung meines Teams suche ich ab Sofort einen
Softwareentwickler[In] f�r die Festanstellung. 
Arbeitsort: Mainz 
Skills:  Programieren, Kentnisse in OpenSource-Bereich
----[ http://www.pribluda.de ]------------------------

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to