> >At least, I assume it did based on > >the fact that all the permissions have changed such that none of the > >rest of us can edit any of the files now...
I uploaded to the server using my own account. Everyone who is admin should be able to do the same. I know I did not put the files up for test, but I felt it was not needed. I *assumed* people tested the thing, and that the build did not change between the releases. I assumed wrongly. Anyway, I'll fix it in the next few days, meanwhile I put up a message on the site (and the install doc) that one also has to download XJavaDoc. Mathias ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aslak Helles�y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:17 AM Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.2- beta3 > Andrew Stevens wrote: > > >On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 14:21, Konstantin Priblouda wrote: > > > > > >>--- Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Simple question: > >>> > >>>Why in beta 3 release all jar are having 1.2b3-dev > >>>suffix in their names? > >>> > >>>e.g.: > >>>xdoclet-borland-module-1.2b3-dev.jar > >>> > >>>is there good reason for that? > >>> > >>> > >>I'm not aware of it... > >> > >> > >> > >>>Why just not 1.2b3? > >>> > >>>Is this mistake ? > >>> > >>> > >>Unfortunately this release was not-so-smooth.... > >> > >> > > > >The release versions of the sources in CVS haven't been tagged, either > >(and there's been more stuff committed since, which makes it more > >awkward to tag the right versions now). > > > >At least the web site got updated. At least, I assume it did based on > >the fact that all the permissions have changed such that none of the > >rest of us can edit any of the files now... > > > >We should probably do a beta 4 ASAP, to fix the various build problems. > >Either that or just pull the current one and re-release it. > > > > > Let's pull the current beta 3 and do it right. -With the old process of > collective responsibility of trying the distro before releasing it. > > Luckily, this headache will go away with xdoclet2, as maven handles > everything nearly automatically. And we also have a test suite :-) > > Aslak > > > > >Andrew. > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > >Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. > >Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! > >INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > >_______________________________________________ > >xdoclet-devel mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > _______________________________________________ > xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
