On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 14:21, Konstantin Priblouda wrote: > --- Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simple question: > > > > Why in beta 3 release all jar are having 1.2b3-dev > > suffix in their names? > > > > e.g.: > > xdoclet-borland-module-1.2b3-dev.jar > > > > is there good reason for that? > > I'm not aware of it... > > > Why just not 1.2b3? > > > > Is this mistake ? > > Unfortunately this release was not-so-smooth....
The release versions of the sources in CVS haven't been tagged, either (and there's been more stuff committed since, which makes it more awkward to tag the right versions now). At least the web site got updated. At least, I assume it did based on the fact that all the permissions have changed such that none of the rest of us can edit any of the files now... We should probably do a beta 4 ASAP, to fix the various build problems. Either that or just pull the current one and re-release it. Andrew. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
