On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 06:59, Andy Jefferson wrote: > On Monday 15 Sep 2003 21:30, Aslak Helles�y wrote: > > >>b). I need an update to the Maven plugin - just want to be able to > > >> configure the "source directory" rather than it taking the maven source > > >> directory (which is a great default on 99% of cases, just that I have a > > >> case where I want to point it somewhere else). How do I get this update > > >> added ? > > > > > >Same as any other update - raise an enhancement request. If you can, > > >create a patch and attach it. > > > > As far as I can tell, the Maven plugin won't be maintained by any of the > > currect XDoclet committers anymore. Anyone, correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > Patches are welcome, but bug reports without fixes will probably be > > ignored. > > Thx for the responses. I appreciate that things get busy so releases can be > spaced out a bit more than people would wish, no problem. > > What i'm really wanting to know is, are you guys going to support the Maven > plugin or not ? ... Aslak thinks not.
Well, I don't mind applying patches, but I don't use the maven plugin myself so the main problem is testing it. Same thing with Erik and that Struts stuff that came up in -user recently - it's not something he uses himself, and he's reluctant to change stuff he can't test. So long as you're happy to test stuff and answer any stupid questions I may have about stuff I think looks strange, then go for it. > To me there doesn't seem much point in > having something in your codebase if your not going to support it - and > similarly not much point in me generating a patch when you may ignore it > anyway since its for something you're not supporting :-( Which is the main reason we're separating out the plugins for XDoclet 2, in the hopes that vendors (or their own user communities) will create & maintain their own plugins. > I've raised various JIRA issues before (without patches, but with specific > details of what needed changing) and they are sat there. I could easily write > a patch for the maven plugin, but my patch would be to the jelly file that is > the plugin (since I'm familiar with jelly scripts etc) ... but I gather you > generate that :-) from some xdt file or something. It is indeed generated, so any patch would have to be to the template that generates it. If you could be a bit more specific about what you want to change in the output file, we can point you at the relevant bit of the template. Andrew. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
