Also, <orion /> generates the finder methods wrongly.
<XDoclet:ifHasClassTag tagName="orion:destination-jndi-name">
<ejb-name><XDoclet:classTagValue tagName="orion:destination-jndi-name"
paramName="name"/></ejb-name>
</XDoclet:ifHasClassTag>
If my experimentations and reading of this template are right, it uses the
@orion:destination-jndiname name attribute for the <ejb-name> in the finder
method. This is not right. It should use the @ejb:bean name attribute for
this and it must ALWAYS be present otherwise the orion-ejb-jar.xml generates
is incorrect.
-mike
Mike Cannon-Brookes :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Atlassian :: http://www.atlassian.com
Supporting YOUR J2EE World
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
> Cannon-Brookes
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] <orion />
>
>
> Add to that I can't work out how to get set mappings to work. Can anyone
> elaborate?
>
> I have a set as a CMP field, the mapping of which looks simple enough, but
> either XDoclet errors OR just hangs all together at the generation of
> orion-ejb-jar.xml (until I kill it).
>
> -mike
>
>
> Mike Cannon-Brookes :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Atlassian :: http://www.atlassian.com
> Supporting YOUR J2EE World
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
> > Cannon-Brookes
> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:03 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] <orion />
> >
> >
> > Just been using the Orion tags, here's a few additions for
> whoever does /
> > maintains them:
> >
> > - in the docs, name should be persistence-name (name of the column). Not
> > sure what the docs for persistence-name mean?
> > - there is no way to set a table name for an entire bean -
> > presumably should
> > be something like @orion:table-name as a class level tag.
> > Currently this has
> > to be merged in which is a PITA for one attribute which everyone uses.
> >
> > I'm sure there'll be more as I get to 'em, but the rest is
> > working great so
> > far!
> >
> > -mike
> >
> >
> > Mike Cannon-Brookes :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Atlassian :: http://www.atlassian.com
> > Supporting YOUR J2EE World
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aslak
> > > Helles�y
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:59 PM
> > > To: Colin Daly; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] one-many unidirectional relationship
> > >
> > >
> > > As I said a couple days ago, uni-directional relations are still
> > > broken. It
> > > doesn't work. I'll notify the list when it's fixed. I've posted a bug
> > > report:
> > >
> > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=472033
> > > &group_id=
> > > 31602
> > >
> > > <aslak/>
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Colin Daly
> > > > Sent: 18. oktober 2001 10:06
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] one-many unidirectional relationship
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > how do i get to this
> > > >
> > > > <ejb-relation>
> > > > <ejb-relation-name>Order-LineItems</ejb-relation-name>
> > > > <ejb-relationship-role>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> <ejb-relationship-role-name>OrderHasLineItems</ejb-relationship-role-name>
> > > > <multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
> > > > <relationship-role-source>
> > > > <ejb-name>OrderEJB</ejb-name>
> > > > </relationship-role-source>
> > > > <cmr-field>
> > > > <cmr-field-name>lineItems</cmr-field-name>
> > > >
> > > > <cmr-field-type>java.util.Collection</cmr-field-type>
> > > > </cmr-field>
> > > > </ejb-relationship-role>
> > > > <ejb-relationship-role>
> > > >
> > > >
> > <ejb-relationship-role-name>LineItemInOrder</ejb-relationship-role-name>
> > > > <multiplicity>Many</multiplicity>
> > > > <cascade-delete/>
> > > > <relationship-role-source>
> > > > <ejb-name>LineItemEJB</ejb-name>
> > > > </relationship-role-source>
> > > > </ejb-relationship-role>
> > > > </ejb-relation>
> > > >
> > > > i've tried this
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > * @return a collection of line items
> > > > *
> > > > * @ejb:interface-method
> > > > * @ejb:relation
> > > > * name="Order-LineItems"
> > > > * role-name="OrderHasLineItems"
> > > > * target-ejb="LineItemEJB"
> > > > * target-role-name="LineItemInOrder"
> > > > *
> > > > */
> > > > public abstract Collection getLineItems();
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and i get a many-to-one instead of a one-to-many
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
