> I'm the guy who wrote it. I'm not interested in maintaining it anymore, > I don't use Orion anymore :-( Pity - why not? Please don't say your company forces WL on you. Even worse, don't say Rickard is forcing JBoss on you ;)
> Anyway, you're right, no table-name. Such things as table-name are more > deployment-oriented so I defined no specific parameters for them, just a > merge point. But it's handy to have table-name param for development. Indeed, table-name shouldn't be merged IMHO. > I'll add want you're wanting as soon as I find time, but, I know you're > a die heart Orion user, are you interested in maintaining <orion/>? :o) Die hard indeed. I'm interested but I'm not really that au fait with XDoclet at the moment, I'm just kicking the tyres. I'll see what I can do if you want? -mike > Ara. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Cannon-Brookes > > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:33 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] <orion /> > > > > Just been using the Orion tags, here's a few additions for whoever > does / > > maintains them: > > > > - in the docs, name should be persistence-name (name of the column). > Not > > sure what the docs for persistence-name mean? > > - there is no way to set a table name for an entire bean - presumably > > should > > be something like @orion:table-name as a class level tag. Currently > this > > has > > to be merged in which is a PITA for one attribute which everyone uses. > > > > I'm sure there'll be more as I get to 'em, but the rest is working > great > > so > > far! > > > > -mike > > > > > > Mike Cannon-Brookes :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Atlassian :: http://www.atlassian.com > > Supporting YOUR J2EE World > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aslak > > > Helles�y > > > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:59 PM > > > To: Colin Daly; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] one-many unidirectional relationship > > > > > > > > > As I said a couple days ago, uni-directional relations are still > > > broken. It > > > doesn't work. I'll notify the list when it's fixed. I've posted a > bug > > > report: > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=472033 > > > &group_id= > > > 31602 > > > > > > <aslak/> > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Colin > > Daly > > > > Sent: 18. oktober 2001 10:06 > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] one-many unidirectional relationship > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how do i get to this > > > > > > > > <ejb-relation> > > > > <ejb-relation-name>Order-LineItems</ejb-relation-name> > > > > <ejb-relationship-role> > > > > > > > > > > > > <ejb-relationship-role-name>OrderHasLineItems</ejb-relationship-role- > > name> > > > > <multiplicity>One</multiplicity> > > > > <relationship-role-source> > > > > <ejb-name>OrderEJB</ejb-name> > > > > </relationship-role-source> > > > > <cmr-field> > > > > <cmr-field-name>lineItems</cmr-field-name> > > > > > > > > <cmr-field-type>java.util.Collection</cmr-field-type> > > > > </cmr-field> > > > > </ejb-relationship-role> > > > > <ejb-relationship-role> > > > > > > > > > <ejb-relationship-role-name>LineItemInOrder</ejb-relationship-role- > > name> > > > > <multiplicity>Many</multiplicity> > > > > <cascade-delete/> > > > > <relationship-role-source> > > > > <ejb-name>LineItemEJB</ejb-name> > > > > </relationship-role-source> > > > > </ejb-relationship-role> > > > > </ejb-relation> > > > > > > > > i've tried this > > > > > > > > /** > > > > * @return a collection of line items > > > > * > > > > * @ejb:interface-method > > > > * @ejb:relation > > > > * name="Order-LineItems" > > > > * role-name="OrderHasLineItems" > > > > * target-ejb="LineItemEJB" > > > > * target-role-name="LineItemInOrder" > > > > * > > > > */ > > > > public abstract Collection getLineItems(); > > > > > > > > > > > > and i get a many-to-one instead of a one-to-many > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
