> > I'm the guy who wrote it. I'm not interested in maintaining it
anymore,
> > I don't use Orion anymore :-(
> Pity - why not? Please don't say your company forces WL on you. Even
> worse,
> don't say Rickard is forcing JBoss on you ;)

Worse than that: WebSphere :o)

> > Anyway, you're right, no table-name. Such things as table-name are
more
> > deployment-oriented so I defined no specific parameters for them,
just a
> > merge point. But it's handy to have table-name param for
development.
> Indeed, table-name shouldn't be merged IMHO.
> 
> > I'll add want you're wanting as soon as I find time, but, I know
you're
> > a die heart Orion user, are you interested in maintaining <orion/>?
:o)
> Die hard indeed. I'm interested but I'm not really that au fait with
> XDoclet
> at the moment, I'm just kicking the tyres. I'll see what I can do if
you
> want?

Good. Familiarize yourself with how xdoclet works. It's easy and
flexible.

Btw, I'm busy right now with a set of refactoring we're doing in
xdoclet, it's my highest priority to complete it asap. Then I'll be free
to work on various bugs/issues/etc.

Ara.


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to