Here we go:

/**
 *
 * @author Miguel Sanchez
 *
 * @ejb:bean
 *    type="Stateless"
 *    name="fooManagement"
 *    jndi-name="fooManagement"
 *    local-jndi-name="fooManagementLocal"
 *    view-type="local"
 *
 */

I also tried it with the following additional tags


*  @ejb:home
*    generate="local"
*
* @ejb:interface
*    generate="local"
*/


What do you mean with sessioninterface subtask ?

Isn't

...
<localinterface/>
<localhomeinterface/>
...

enough ?


Thanx,

Mige



Dmitri Colebatch wrote:

> should work fine.  Things to check are:
>  - have the sessioninterface subtask
>  - have the correct ejb:bean and ejb:interface tags
>
> if you want to post your class level comments, that might shed some more
> light - but I can assure you they work fine (o:
>
> cheers
> dim
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Miguel Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:49 PM
> Subject: [Xdoclet-user] session bean's local interfaces
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm currently testing xdoclet 1.1 for generating EJBs. With entity beans
> > it works great. However, I cannot get xdoclet to generate local
> > interfaces for session bean classes.
> > Has anyone made the same experience ?
> >
> > For discussion:
> > I think it's extremely important for a tool like XDOCLET to support the
> > whole EJB specification correctly. If not, once you have to adjust
> > something manually you won't be able to easily regenerate your stuff
> > without losing your manual changes and even worse you would have to make
> > all further changes manually.
> >
> > Mige
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user



_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to