My bean implements SessionBean, I do not need </session> enabled and I won't agree with your comment on @ejb:home generate until the documentation does.
Once again: I'm using XDOCLET 1.1 and getting entity 2.0 beans perfectly generated with local interfaces. However, with my (stateless) session beans I can get XDOCLET only to generate non-local interfaces. But I WANT LOCAL INTERFACES !!! Can anyone provide me working class level comments ? Would be great !! Mige I tried it with the TellerBean tags Ara Abrahamian schrieb: > See TellerBean in samples and follow it. Maybe the bean doesn't > implement SessionBean? If <session/> is enabled, then the bean should be > abstract, if not the bean shouldn't be abstract. > > @ejb:home generate="local" is wrong, generate="true|false", but if you > disable it then make sure you use class="com.foo.MyHome". > > Ara. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Miguel Sanchez > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:48 PM > > To: Dmitri Colebatch; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] session bean's local interfaces > > > > Here we go: > > > > /** > > * > > * @author Miguel Sanchez > > * > > * @ejb:bean > > * type="Stateless" > > * name="fooManagement" > > * jndi-name="fooManagement" > > * local-jndi-name="fooManagementLocal" > > * view-type="local" > > * > > */ > > > > I also tried it with the following additional tags > > > > > > * @ejb:home > > * generate="local" > > * > > * @ejb:interface > > * generate="local" > > */ > > > > > > What do you mean with sessioninterface subtask ? > > > > Isn't > > > > ... > > <localinterface/> > > <localhomeinterface/> > > ... > > > > enough ? > > > > > > Thanx, > > > > Mige > > > > > > > > Dmitri Colebatch wrote: > > > > > should work fine. Things to check are: > > > - have the sessioninterface subtask > > > - have the correct ejb:bean and ejb:interface tags > > > > > > if you want to post your class level comments, that might shed some > more > > > light - but I can assure you they work fine (o: > > > > > > cheers > > > dim > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Miguel Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:49 PM > > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] session bean's local interfaces > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm currently testing xdoclet 1.1 for generating EJBs. With entity > > beans > > > > it works great. However, I cannot get xdoclet to generate local > > > > interfaces for session bean classes. > > > > Has anyone made the same experience ? > > > > > > > > For discussion: > > > > I think it's extremely important for a tool like XDOCLET to > support > > the > > > > whole EJB specification correctly. If not, once you have to adjust > > > > something manually you won't be able to easily regenerate your > stuff > > > > without losing your manual changes and even worse you would have > to > > make > > > > all further changes manually. > > > > > > > > Mige > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
