chef you're the chief !! I wouldn't consider this as serious bug ... but nice to know, or no ?!
Thanx, Mige "Kuntz, Tim" schrieb: > I'm jumping in a little late on this but I ran into what _sounds_ like a > similar problem. When I switched to 1.1 the following method tags would > cause only the "first" tag interface to generate. If I switched them I'd > get the "local" interface - in this example. > > * @ejb:interface-method type="remote" > * @ejb:interface-method type="local" > > I think the change was to just mark it as an interface method and let the > ant subtask control the generation - which made sense to me. > > * @ejb:interface-method > > Tim Kuntz > The Pampered Chef > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Miguel Sanchez [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 2:56 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] session bean's local interfaces > > > > My bean implements SessionBean, I do not need </session> enabled and I > > won't > > agree with your comment on @ejb:home generate until the documentation > > does. > > > > Once again: > > > > I'm using XDOCLET 1.1 and getting entity 2.0 beans perfectly generated > > with > > local interfaces. However, with my (stateless) session beans I can get > > XDOCLET only to generate non-local interfaces. But I WANT LOCAL > > INTERFACES > > !!! > > > > Can anyone provide me working class level comments ? Would be great !! > > > > Mige > > > > > > > > I tried it with the TellerBean tags > > > > Ara Abrahamian schrieb: > > > > > See TellerBean in samples and follow it. Maybe the bean doesn't > > > implement SessionBean? If <session/> is enabled, then the bean should be > > > abstract, if not the bean shouldn't be abstract. > > > > > > @ejb:home generate="local" is wrong, generate="true|false", but if you > > > disable it then make sure you use class="com.foo.MyHome". > > > > > > Ara. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-user- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Miguel Sanchez > > > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:48 PM > > > > To: Dmitri Colebatch; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] session bean's local interfaces > > > > > > > > Here we go: > > > > > > > > /** > > > > * > > > > * @author Miguel Sanchez > > > > * > > > > * @ejb:bean > > > > * type="Stateless" > > > > * name="fooManagement" > > > > * jndi-name="fooManagement" > > > > * local-jndi-name="fooManagementLocal" > > > > * view-type="local" > > > > * > > > > */ > > > > > > > > I also tried it with the following additional tags > > > > > > > > > > > > * @ejb:home > > > > * generate="local" > > > > * > > > > * @ejb:interface > > > > * generate="local" > > > > */ > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you mean with sessioninterface subtask ? > > > > > > > > Isn't > > > > > > > > ... > > > > <localinterface/> > > > > <localhomeinterface/> > > > > ... > > > > > > > > enough ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, > > > > > > > > Mige > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitri Colebatch wrote: > > > > > > > > > should work fine. Things to check are: > > > > > - have the sessioninterface subtask > > > > > - have the correct ejb:bean and ejb:interface tags > > > > > > > > > > if you want to post your class level comments, that might shed some > > > more > > > > > light - but I can assure you they work fine (o: > > > > > > > > > > cheers > > > > > dim > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Miguel Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:49 PM > > > > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] session bean's local interfaces > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm currently testing xdoclet 1.1 for generating EJBs. With entity > > > > beans > > > > > > it works great. However, I cannot get xdoclet to generate local > > > > > > interfaces for session bean classes. > > > > > > Has anyone made the same experience ? > > > > > > > > > > > > For discussion: > > > > > > I think it's extremely important for a tool like XDOCLET to > > > support > > > > the > > > > > > whole EJB specification correctly. If not, once you have to adjust > > > > > > something manually you won't be able to easily regenerate your > > > stuff > > > > > > without losing your manual changes and even worse you would have > > > to > > > > make > > > > > > all further changes manually. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mige > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
