I'd like to congratulate the team, I'm finding XDoclet extremely useful for EJB development. Just have a few queries.
1. It seems that most of the Vendor specific tags are actually deployment tags and are relevant to all appservers. Are there are plans to homogenise via an appserver neutral syntax? 2. The EJBUtil classes which can be generated hold statics for the COMP_NAME and JNDI_NAME. JNDI_NAME might make sense but COMP_NAME is really specific to clients of that bean. Shouldn't client beans (which must have ejb-refs to these target beans) instead have entries in *their* BeanUtil classes that provide the COMP_NAMEs for their ejb-refs? I hope that's made sense to everyone. William Ferguson _______________________________________________________________ Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - http://www.cowanalexander.com/calendar _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
