> 1. It seems that most of the Vendor specific tags are actually
deployment
> tags and are relevant to all appservers. Are there are plans to
homogenise
> via an appserver neutral syntax?

Yes, step by step. v1.2 has a set of @ejb:persistence tags for example
which tries to define a common tags for database persistence tags
(column-name, table-name stuff like those). We haven't yet applied it on
all of the modules but we're moving in that direction.

> 2. The EJBUtil classes which can be generated hold statics for the
> COMP_NAME
> and JNDI_NAME. JNDI_NAME might make sense but COMP_NAME is really
specific
> to clients of that bean. Shouldn't client beans (which must have
ejb-refs
> to
> these target beans) instead have entries in *their* BeanUtil classes
that
> provide the COMP_NAMEs for their ejb-refs?

Imho it's better to keep everything in a single lookup class. We'll add
support for multiple comp_names later, when we implement Tyler Jewel's
multi-jndi-deployment pattern, and there will be getHomeOfThisJndi() and
getHomeOfThatJndi() methods.

Ara.



_______________________________________________________________

Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory
Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - http://www.cowanalexander.com/calendar



_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to