Hi Jeff, On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:16, Jeff Markham wrote: > Maybe I'm not reading your message right but if you have relationships in > ejb-jar.xml, you really can't avoid them in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml (So far as I > know, anyway). You mention you have the relationships defined in > ejb-jar.xml but that'll only take you so far. You'll have to define > somewhere how JBoss will figure out those relationships (key-fields, > column-names, etc.) which is in the <relationships> section of > jbosscmp-jdbc.xml.
You DO NOT have to define them in the jbosscmp-jdbc file. I have the app running now with no relationships in there, they are defined in ejb-jar.xml only. The jbosscmp-jdbc file is not ADD TO the definition in ejb-jar.xml only (if you want to add to it). At this stage I do not want to add to it in terms of relationships. JBoss as a J2EE container can figure out relationships based on the ejb-jar definition and it adds all necessary foreign keys or intermediary tables to provide these relationships. > Is there a reason why you don't want to use @jboss.relation tags? Using > them won't screw up your app for other J2EE containers. Yes, I know. I intend to get the app running based on the ejb-jar definition of relationships first, and then maybe add server-specific tags later to fine-tune things. -- Andy ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
