Inger, Matthew wrote:
If the project page ever works, I will consider it. xdoclet.codehaus.org brings up a directory page which has no directory entries.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XDOCLET (Did i mention it was lacking documentation ? :p)
Check the plugins out of cvs ( http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XDOCLET/XDocletPlugins ) and have a look at sample-web to see usage, and any plugin you know what the output should (plugin-web i'm guessing) to see how it's written.
Lets please continue this discussion on xdoclet-plugins user ml. (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XDOCLET/ProjectInfo)
matthew.hawthorne wrote:
Write the plugin then.Maybe I've got tunnel vision, but I think that generating EJBs is the
primary reason that most people use Xdoclet. Am I wrong?
So, in my opinion, it seems kind of ridiculous to "release" Xdoclet2 if it doesn't generate EJBs.
It's the most popular reason why people *use* xdoclet. It's not necessarily the only reason.
I guess xdoclet will eventually find a niche with other plugins, because they're to write.
But then again, jsr-175 and annotations will maybe find their niche before that.
Cheers,
greg
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
