+1 for a 1.3 release. On 6/16/06, Andrew Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:59, Konstantin Priblouda wrote: > > --- "Reao, Eric (Mission Systems)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Will there be another formal release of xdoclet in > > > the future (a new > > > revision to version 1.2.3) or has the entire effort > > > moved on to > > > xdoclet2? > > > > Actually there was an idea to move effort to xdoclet > > 2, > > but significant amount of effort perefered to stay > > with > > xdoclet 1... ( though xdoclet 2 is usable in > > production since 2003 ) > > I'm not so sure about the "significant", if you check the CVS logs > there's only been a few people committed anything in the last year or > so, and nothing for a few months now. > > The fact that there wasn't an easy migration route (e.g. a compatibility > wrapper XJavadoc metadata provider and .xdt templating support) for the > existing modules didn't help v2's cause; we've still got a number that > only exist in the old version, so many people can't move to the new > one. And I don't have time (or inclination) to learn any more scripting > languages that I'm not going to use anywhere else. Heck, work's keeping > me so busy I don't even have time to hack around on PseudoQ[1] as much > as I'd like... > > Besides, technology moves on. With the new J2EE stuff (and other > frameworks) using annotations for a lot of the things XDoclet used to > help with, I suspect it's only a matter or time before there's little > need for it any more. > > > Andrew. > > [1] http://pseudoq.sourceforge.net/ Java-based app for creating, > playing and solving Sudoku puzzles. > > > _______________________________________________ > xdoclet-user mailing list > xdoclet-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user >
_______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list xdoclet-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
