On 13/10/16 12:28, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 13/10/16 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> "Just" as per the subject, I wrote feature documents for (almost) all our
>> schedulers. No big deal, I'd say, apart from the fact that I'm declaring
>> Credit2 **Supperted**, instead of experimental.
> Supperted? That's like supported right? ;p
> It is fine for you to propose that a feature should be upgraded to
> supported, and this is probably the best way to formally do so.
> However, final agreement of a feature becoming supported should include
> input from the security team. (At the end of the day, it is us with
> extra work if the feature isn't up to scratch.)
Yes, interesting idea. I don't think in our discussions of feature
lifecycle maturity we'd talked about that yet.
Xen-devel mailing list