On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 13/10/16 12:01, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > "Just" as per the subject, I wrote feature documents for (almost) all our
> > schedulers. No big deal, I'd say, apart from the fact that I'm declaring
> > Credit2 **Supperted**, instead of experimental.
> Supperted?  That's like supported right? ;p
> It is fine for you to propose that a feature should be upgraded to
> supported, and this is probably the best way to formally do so.
> However, final agreement of a feature becoming supported should include
> input from the security team. (At the end of the day, it is us with
> extra work if the feature isn't up to scratch.)

Is this new? If so, should we formalize the change in process somewhere
(patch to governance, etc.)?

Xen-devel mailing list

Reply via email to