On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:56:23AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 04.01.19 at 11:33, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ X: xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ > > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/ > > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/ > > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c > > +X: xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c > > Much like for patch 3, I'm not convinced this is appropriate. > > > @@ -312,6 +313,14 @@ M: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > > S: Supported > > T: git https://xenbits.xenproject.org/git-http/ovmf.git > > > > +PCI > > +M: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > +R: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > > +S: Supported > > +F: xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c > > +F: xen/drivers/pci/ > > +F: xen/include/xen/pci* > > I'm fine with the last two, but I think truly IOMMU-independent > code would better be moved from the file named first to a file in > the directory named second.
Let me see if I can find a way to do such movement, I'm not sure how entangled the code is. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
