>>> On 04.01.19 at 11:33, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ X: xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/ > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/ > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c > +X: xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
Much like for patch 3, I'm not convinced this is appropriate. > @@ -312,6 +313,14 @@ M: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > S: Supported > T: git https://xenbits.xenproject.org/git-http/ovmf.git > > +PCI > +M: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > +R: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > +S: Supported > +F: xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c > +F: xen/drivers/pci/ > +F: xen/include/xen/pci* I'm fine with the last two, but I think truly IOMMU-independent code would better be moved from the file named first to a file in the directory named second. The whole situation arises from the origin of this code, which back then was needed solely for the purposes of IOMMU management. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
