On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 17:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 8/5/19 4:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 26.07.2019 08:25, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > > > 1) The commit is empty, presumably because I did apply the patch a > > few > > days ago already. > > > > 2) The committer is recorded as "Patchew Importer < > > impor...@patchew.org>". > > Do we really want to hide the fact who has been committing a patch? > > While it's mostly mechanical, there's still the human decision of > > "this > > is ready to go in" involved, which I don't think a bot can reliably > > take > > in all cases. > > Both of these are mistakes, and due to the fact that I `git fetch`ed > patchew's commit rather than doing `git am` of the mbox provided by > patchew. (And I used patchew's commit because somehow 4/4 didn't > reach > my inbox.) > And this last part is apparently my fault, as your email address is actually wrong, in the Cc line of that patch.
So I guess I had a part in this as well... Sorry about that! :-) Regards -- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel