> On Aug 5, 2019, at 6:30 PM, Dario Faggioli <dfaggi...@suse.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 17:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 8/5/19 4:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 26.07.2019 08:25, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>>> >>> 1) The commit is empty, presumably because I did apply the patch a >>> few >>> days ago already. >>> >>> 2) The committer is recorded as "Patchew Importer < >>> impor...@patchew.org>". >>> Do we really want to hide the fact who has been committing a patch? >>> While it's mostly mechanical, there's still the human decision of >>> "this >>> is ready to go in" involved, which I don't think a bot can reliably >>> take >>> in all cases. >> >> Both of these are mistakes, and due to the fact that I `git fetch`ed >> patchew's commit rather than doing `git am` of the mbox provided by >> patchew. (And I used patchew's commit because somehow 4/4 didn't >> reach >> my inbox.) >> > And this last part is apparently my fault, as your email address is > actually wrong, in the Cc line of that patch.
That would explain it. :-) But that’s by no means your “fault”: It’s very common for me to only be CC’d on a subset of patches in a series (e.g., because I’m the maintainer for some patches but not others), so “receiving a only a subset of patches” is something my workflow should handle effectively but didn’t. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
