Jan Kiszka wrote: > As a first step, I would vote for establishing that generic service to > redirect the userspace return path to some arbitrary handler in hard-RT > context. Then we can think about how to handle signal injection from > Linux vs. injection from Xenomai gracefully.
Ok, the first idea was a bad idea. Will try the second, or the alternative proposed by Philippe. > > > > > > > > > What do you think, is it worth including as a POSIX counterpart for > > > testsuite/latency? > > > > There are a few details that I do not like about this tool, but we may > > take it, and fix the details later. > > It's a real hack, isn't it ;)? But what precisely do you mean? What I dislike most, is the lack of return values check. This may work well with Linux, but not with Xenomai. I would also prefer a clean shutdown using pthread_cancel, after all sigwait and *nanosleep are cancellation points, so it should work even without resorting to cleanup handlers. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core