Heikki Lindholm wrote:
 > One more thing though: Having always the same values doesn't tell if the 
 > task's state is overwritten with some "older generation" of its state or 
 > something odd like that. The state-saving will only need to work once 
 > and if it sucks rest of the time nobody knows. Or was that accounted for 
 > in the code? (Didn't read it all that carefully, lazy me)

That is right, the new implementation compute a different value for each


                                            Gilles Chanteperdrix.

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to