Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> AFAIC, I don't see how changing priorities on the fly within a time critical
>>> section could be considered as good programming practice; this would tend to
>>> indicate that somebody is playing with priorities to paper over an
>>> design issue.
>> So, you mean PIP papers over application design issues ? Just kidding...
> In this case, we face an operation mode switch of the thread: It use to
> due high prio work in primary mode only, now its finished and what to
"It used to do [...] and wants to [...]" - hell...
> flush its data to Linux, but without causing troubles to the Linux
> schedule due to its SCHED_FIFO level.
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Xenomai-core mailing list