Philippe Gerum wrote: > AFAIC, I don't see how changing priorities on the fly within a time critical > section could be considered as good programming practice; this would tend to > indicate that somebody is playing with priorities to paper over an application > design issue.
So, you mean PIP papers over application design issues ? Just kidding... > For that reason, enduring a mode switch upon > rt_task_set_priority() calls (and friends) would be ok for me. But that's > certainly debatable. Actually, we could trigger a signal for pthread_setschedparam to be called for next switch to secondary mode. We could re-use the signal already used to trigger a switch to primary mode for suspending a thread running in secondary mode, finding a way to multiplex the information passing, for instance, parameters to the siginfo structure. -- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core