Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am working on automated build tests of several configurations of >> Xenomai head. While running them, I found a few issues, and would >> need acks, since it is in parts others maintain. >> >> Alex: https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-git/2009-12/msg00112.html >> >> >> Wolfgang: >> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-git/2009-12/msg00113.html >> > > Though I'm not Wolfgang: > > config XENO_DRIVERS_CAN_SJA1000_PEAK_DNG - depends on > XENO_DRIVERS_CAN_SJA1000 + depends on XENO_DRIVERS_CAN_SJA1000 > && !PARPORT tristate "PEAK Parallel Port Dongle" help > > That's not obviously related. Why do we need it?
Kconfig says: config XENO_DRIVERS_CAN_SJA1000_PEAK_DNG depends on XENO_DRIVERS_CAN_SJA1000 tristate "PEAK Parallel Port Dongle" help This driver is for the PCAN Dongle, the PC parallel port to CAN converter from PEAK Systems (http://www.peak-system.com). You need to disable parallel port support in the kernel (CONFIG_PARPORT) for proper operation. The interface type (sp or epp), I/O port and interrupt number should be defined via module parameters. > >> Anyone: >> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-git/2009-12/msg00114.html >> > > If it builds, it's fine (I don't think anyone is using x86 on 2.4 > anymore). I do not think so either, but since we ship this patch, we should check that it compiles at least... Or remove it. > >> Philippe (check powerpc 2.4): >> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-git/2009-12/msg00115.html >> >> The current status of the tests may be found here: >> http://sisyphus.hd.free.fr/~gilles/bx/ > > Nice! That's not buildbot-based, is it? No. Only plain shell. Anyway, what dominates the run-time is the x86 debian-like .config builds. I do not plan to run these tests after each commit or even every night, only to validate a relase before pushing it on the download area. -- Gilles _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core