Am 04.11.2010 23:08, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> rework. Safer for now is likely to revert 56ff4329ff, keeping nucleus >> debugging off. > > That is not enough.
It is, I've reviewed the code today. > This commit was followed by several others to "fix > the fix". You know how things are, someone proposes a fix, which fixes > things for him, but it breaks in the other people configurations (one of > the fallouts was a complete revamp of include/asm-arm/atomic.h for > instance). > I've pushed a series that reverts that commit, then fixes and cleans up on top of it. Just pushed if you want to take a look. We can find some alternative debugging mechanism independently (though I'm curious to see it - it still makes no sense to me). Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core