Am 04.11.2010 23:08, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> rework. Safer for now is likely to revert 56ff4329ff, keeping nucleus
>> debugging off.
> 
> That is not enough.

It is, I've reviewed the code today.

> This commit was followed by several others to "fix
> the fix". You know how things are, someone proposes a fix, which fixes
> things for him, but it breaks in the other people configurations (one of
> the fallouts was a complete revamp of include/asm-arm/atomic.h for
> instance).
> 

I've pushed a series that reverts that commit, then fixes and cleans up
on top of it. Just pushed if you want to take a look. We can find some
alternative debugging mechanism independently (though I'm curious to see
it - it still makes no sense to me).

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to