Thanks for the reply. Can you please tell me why my questions are useless.
Such attitude will take Xenomai user group no where.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix <
> krishna m wrote:
> > I ported the backfire tool in the OSADL site [
> https://www.osadl.org/backfire-4.backfire.0.html] to measure the user
> to/from kernel latency.I wanted to measure the difference between the
> RT_PREEMPT kernel and Xenomai Kernel. Surprisingly i see RT_PREEMPT
> performance better than Xenomai.
> > Here are few points to note:
> > 1. The thread priority of the "sendme" tool of backfire in RT_PREEMPT is
> 99 [highest]
> > 2. I have made the thread priority 99 for the rt_task that i spawn [par
> of ported sendme]
> > ret = rt_task_shadow(&rt_task_desc, NULL, 99, 0);
> > My Questions:
> > * I wanted to know if any one has done such measurements using backfire
> and how dose Xenomai fair agnist RT_PREEMPT?
> > * is there any similar tool like backfire in the Xenomai tool set that
> dose the similar measurements?
> > * Do I need to do more Xenomai specific optimization in the "sendme" and
> "backfire" code to get better performance?
> Useless notes, useless questions. Show us the "ported" code.
Xenomai-core mailing list