James,
I guess we can rename the StringTokenizer to something else say
XercesStringTokenizer in Xerces 1.5. Despite that we are almost ready to announce
Xerces 1.5, this change just delay the announcement by a couple of days (need to
rebuild and test). I will let you know once we are done so that you can update
your Mac project files as well.
BTW as we haven't tried Xerces 1.5 with Xalan, if you found any further conflicts,
please let us ASAP so that we can fix them before the official Xerces 1.5 is out.
Thanks!
Tinny
James Berry wrote:
> Thanks David. I guess, though, that if I could ask for anything I'd rather
> have Xerces 1.5 be compatible with Xalan basically out of the box,
> especially if there are no other issues anticipated between Xalan and Xerces
> 1.5. This would certainly make the life easier for those working with both
> Xerces 1.5 and Xalan.
>
> Does anybody know of other issues, given the Xerces 1.5 feature set and
> changes, that will prevent compatibility with the current Xalan?
>
> Thoughts Tinny?
>
> -jdb
>
> On 6/10/01 6:44 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > We're not building Xalan against Xerces-C 1.5 yet, since we'll do our next
> > release with 1.4. When we move up to Xerces-C, we can rename our class, I
> > suppose.
> >
> > A while back, we adopted the policy of preceeding all of our new class
> > names with Xalan. The Xerces team should consider doing the same thing, so
> > we can avoid more conflicts -- especially with common names like
> > StringTokenizer.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > James Berry
> > <jberry@critica To: Xerces C Dev
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > lpath.com> cc: (bcc: David N
> > Bertoni/CAM/Lotus)
> > Subject: Xerces-C 1.5 & Xalan-C
> > StringTokenizer symbols conflict
> > 06/10/2001
> > 08:38 PM
> > Please respond
> > to xerces-c-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In trying half-heartedly to link the Xerces-C 1.5 candidate up with the
> > current Xalan-C TOT, I get a symbol conflict: they each use a similar
> > StringTokenizer class.
> >
> > Does anybody have a plan for this? Since Xerces is coming late to the party
> > maybe a change should be made there before 1.5?
> >
> > Thoughts? Or is somebody way past me on this one?
> >
> > -jdb
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
