Unfortunately, some of us are stuck with "cave compilers", and would
greatly appreciate support for them not being broken... although I
agree that they are sad.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:32:47 -0700, Dean Roddey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>"A while back, we adopted the policy of preceeding all of our new class
>names with Xalan. The Xerces team should consider doing the same thing, so
>we can avoid more conflicts -- especially with common names like
>StringTokenizer."
>
>Another option of course would be to finally make the decision to drop the
>'cave compilers' and start using namespaces. I've argued against that before
>(well, actually I've argued that as long as we have to support compilers
>that don't support namespaces I'd prefer not to do some big macro hack to
>half support them), but as time goes by it seems more and more ridiculous to
>continue supporting such sad compilers.
>
>--------------
>Dean Roddey
>Software Geek Extraordinaire
>Portal, Inc
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Steve Heller, WA0CPP
(backup email: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP public key available from http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371
http://www.steveheller.com
Author of "Learning to Program in C++", Who's Afraid of C++?", "Who's Afraid of More
C++?",
"Optimizing C++", and other books
Free online versions of "Who's Afraid of C++?" and "Optimizing C++" are now available
at http://www.steveheller.com/whos and http://www.steveheller.com/opt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
