James,
As indicated in Khaled's note, he is going to name it XMLStringTokenizer.cpp & hpp.
Please update the Mac project files accordingly.
Thanks!
Tinny
Tinny Ng wrote:
> James,
>
> I guess we can rename the StringTokenizer to something else say
> XercesStringTokenizer in Xerces 1.5. Despite that we are almost ready to announce
> Xerces 1.5, this change just delay the announcement by a couple of days (need to
> rebuild and test). I will let you know once we are done so that you can update
> your Mac project files as well.
>
> BTW as we haven't tried Xerces 1.5 with Xalan, if you found any further conflicts,
> please let us ASAP so that we can fix them before the official Xerces 1.5 is out.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tinny
>
> James Berry wrote:
>
> > Thanks David. I guess, though, that if I could ask for anything I'd rather
> > have Xerces 1.5 be compatible with Xalan basically out of the box,
> > especially if there are no other issues anticipated between Xalan and Xerces
> > 1.5. This would certainly make the life easier for those working with both
> > Xerces 1.5 and Xalan.
> >
> > Does anybody know of other issues, given the Xerces 1.5 feature set and
> > changes, that will prevent compatibility with the current Xalan?
> >
> > Thoughts Tinny?
> >
> > -jdb
> >
> > On 6/10/01 6:44 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We're not building Xalan against Xerces-C 1.5 yet, since we'll do our next
> > > release with 1.4. When we move up to Xerces-C, we can rename our class, I
> > > suppose.
> > >
> > > A while back, we adopted the policy of preceeding all of our new class
> > > names with Xalan. The Xerces team should consider doing the same thing, so
> > > we can avoid more conflicts -- especially with common names like
> > > StringTokenizer.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > James Berry
> > > <jberry@critica To: Xerces C Dev
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > lpath.com> cc: (bcc: David N
> > > Bertoni/CAM/Lotus)
> > > Subject: Xerces-C 1.5 & Xalan-C
> > > StringTokenizer symbols conflict
> > > 06/10/2001
> > > 08:38 PM
> > > Please respond
> > > to xerces-c-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In trying half-heartedly to link the Xerces-C 1.5 candidate up with the
> > > current Xalan-C TOT, I get a symbol conflict: they each use a similar
> > > StringTokenizer class.
> > >
> > > Does anybody have a plan for this? Since Xerces is coming late to the party
> > > maybe a change should be made there before 1.5?
> > >
> > > Thoughts? Or is somebody way past me on this one?
> > >
> > > -jdb
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
