Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vote

[Martin Kalen]

Martin Kalen:    NO/-1


We use Xerces-C on Windows NT4/2000, HP-UX, Linux, Solaris, AIX,
OpenServer, UnixWare and Tru64 so I am neither pro-UNIX or pro-Windows.

We have numerous hours invested in integrating the Xerces-C directory- and
make-structure into our own automated make- and regression-test
environment. Any change to the directory names would be a major setback for
us.

I think Peter Volchek et. al. summarised this very good - there are other
issues that need to be dealt with before doing this. (The different ports
are hopelessly out of synch with regards to the "main"/samples/tests
directories, for one...)

If there were no Murphy's law about diskcrashes and that autoconf-work had
been saved, I would have voted differently. Now, it's just not worth it.

Keep up the good work with Xerces-C!

--
Martin Kalen
Software Engineer
TODAY Systems, Inc.
http://www.todaysystems.com.au/
Tel +61-3-9536 3900 - Fax +61-3-9536 3901


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]