Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vote

[Martin Kalen]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vote


> > I said that I would
> > gladly welcome a major change to directory/make-structure if it was
just
> > that - a major change and I could see all the benefits from it. I
clearly
> > said that if autoconf support had been there I would happily vote yes
for a
> > directory renaming. Now it will mean two takes at changing the
environment.
>
> A valid point. If this vote isn't passed, then I might suggest a far
> more ambitious Xerces-C++2 branch in which we could make far more
> ambitious changes.

Agreed. Sounds like a good idea! Perhaps too much administration work for
the CVS-people? I'm +(a lot) for this, though.

> I'm quite capable of being annoying just be sticking to the technical
details.

True. :-)

> A vote is a vote, but you should expect comments to be replied to.

I do, but I thought you overexaggerated and the last thing I want on this
list is a flamewar (that's why I thought we could take it to personal
mail). But any comments that are valid for the whole list should still be
here, so no harm done.

Regards,
 Martin.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]