I don't know why, but I always get two copies of replies.

Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 22:51, D. Stimits wrote:
> > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > >
> > ...snip...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What is required to get the ball rolling on this as a change? Should I
> > > > submit an altered package that is similar to the sane_includes?
> > >
> > > sane_includes fixes all of the problems. I will push for those changes
> > > to be applied *after* the next bugfix release. We've already been
> > > through the process with that.
> >
> > Don't forget to propagate the make install prefix bug fix to
> > sane_includes, it looks like it was formed before the prefix changes.
> 
> Of course.
> 
> > >
> > > > This is
> > > > holding back a project due to wanting to see whether it gets fixed on
> > > > both win32 and linux (the cvs change already fixed the broken make
> > > > install on linux/UNIX) for the package layout. I suspect that maybe it
> > > > is fear of the dramatic changes to the cvs tree, more than anything,
> > > > that is delaying a more sane official package layout.
> > >
> > > I believe that we decided that that's worthwhile and possible. There's
> > > no point in discussing it until after the next release.
> >
> > What kind of time frame is expected for the next bugfix release? It also
> > sounds like the bugfix release itself will not reflect sane_includes, is
> > that correct?
> 
> Haven't I just been saying that? If I'm waiting until after the release
> to make the changes, then it's likely that the release will not include
> the changes.
> 
>  If the bugfix release does not reflect sane_includes, is
> > there a probable time frame beyond the bugfix release that will reflect
> > sane_includes?
> 
> Nobody can predict the future.

Is there an approximation of what a typical time is between releases for
bugfixes? Is it typical for it to occur monthly?

D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to